Back in August of 2005, Congress passed a law entitled the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Among the myriad of provisions, there was a the following:
(a) Definitions Relating to Motor Carriers. — Paragraphs (6), (7), (12), and (13) of section 13102 of title 49, United States Code, are each amended by striking "motor vehicle" and inserting "commercial motor vehicle as defined in section 31132."
At first, these seems like a minor changes of little consequence. The law only sets out what types of operations the Department of Transportation can regulate, and the DOT has only ever regulated commercial motor vehicles. That is, the DOT had never previously exercised its authority to regulate non-commercial vehicles. Thus, from the DOT's point of view, that particular section was a non-event. However, the Department of Labor has a very different point of view.
It has long been the law that truck drivers were either subject to regulation by the Department of Transportation or the Department of Labor, but not both. This law removed the ability of the DOT to regulate vehicles of less than 10,001 lbs, and thus would subject the drivers of these vehicles to Department of Labor regulation -- and the drivers would be entitled to overtime.
Prior to the 2005 law, the idea that the motor carrier exemption could extend to any vehicle had created some unfortunate results. For instance, in Friedrich v. U.S. Computer Services, 974 F.2d 409 (3rd Cir. 1992), the motor carrier exemption, commonly called the "truck driver exemption," was applied to field service engineers who provided computer hardware and software to customers engaged in the cable television business. Apparently, the engineers drove their personal vehicles across state lines but were carrying tools and replacement parts. This was sufficient to make them "private motor carriers," and thus exempt from overtime. Since then, employers have been trying to apply this exemption to anyone who ever drove across state line carrying anything at all (pens, pencils, papers, etc.).
Since the enactment of the SAFETEA-LU, the DOL has taken the position that drivers of vehicles with a gross weight rating of 10,000 lbs or less are entitled to overtime pay, even if they driver interstate. The DOL has posted its position on the Motor Carrier Exemption on the web.
In addition, courts have started to agree with the DOL. For instance, in Musarra v. Digital Dish, Inc., 454 F.Supp.2d 692 (S.D. Ohio 2006), the court notes:
Before August 10, 2005, the FLSA's MCA exemption applied to most employees who drove any type and size of motor vehicle in interstate commerce. After the passage of SAFETEA-LU, however, vehicles that were previously exempt under the old definition of "motor vehicle" are no longer exempt because they are not "commercial motor vehicles." See Felhaber, Larson, Felon, Vogt, P.A., Big Changes in Exempt Status for Drivers and Mortgage Loan Officers, 16 No. 4 Minn. Emp. L. Letter 2, at *2 (June 2006).
Other courts have also been willing to follow this holding.
Unfortunately, these interpretations by the courts have not gone unnoticed by Congress. In the 109th Congress, H.R. 5576 attempted to undo the amendment and revert the FLSA to its previous status. This bill failed to pass the Senate, and it does not seem that Congress has expressed an interest in picking it back up this year. As such, a confusing and much abused loophole in the Motor Carrier Exemption seems to finally have been closed.
I have posted a good reference on the current overview of California truck driver overtime on my "got overtime" website.
This a very good analysis of the recentr FLSA 13(b)(1) changes. But you forgot to mention the affect on drivers's helpers and loaders.
Posted by: Paul Wilson | April 07, 2009 at 08:31 PM
someone needs to step up for the truck driver that gets paid hourly,butdoes not get paid for overtime.
Posted by: terry | November 03, 2009 at 04:25 PM
Its unique one, which helps to say more about this business to read. Thanks
Posted by: Fog Light | January 30, 2010 at 01:42 AM
I came across your blog.& reading along.Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: HID Kit | February 26, 2010 at 12:52 AM
At first we were lurking on the road, then impose taxes on imports from abroad and now on the sales in the country...and now changing laws. Something feels a bit strange. Let's focus on improving and promoting those trucks drivers and try to Support in finding technologies which keep the environment and planet!
Posted by: truck rental | March 17, 2010 at 04:16 AM
Well, the motor carrier exemption, commonly called the "truck driver exemption," was applied to field service engineers who provided computer hardware and software to customers engaged in the cable television business.
James
Posted by: dump truck rentals | April 13, 2010 at 08:29 AM
Today I was randomly looking over my Amazon profile, and found a list I made of products that help build fine-motor skills in babies, toddlers, and children. I wrote it in 2007 when Jake was 5 and in still in Occupational Therapy - we were really focusing at the time on his fine motor skills. I owe a lot of what I know about such things to our lovely O.T. Rachael, and to many of the books I have listed to the right.
I think a lot of people would be surprised how easy it is to start including fine-motor activities in playtime . . . especially since so many really fun things help to build those skills! Many of you are probably already doing some of these activities with your children and not realizing how great they are for development.
Posted by: sildenafil citrate | April 23, 2010 at 08:39 AM
Thanks for the post!
I was raised in Florida so tire chains had been totally foreign to me, until I moved to CA a few years ago. Moving in the middle of winter is not fun, let me tell you. I guess I ought to have paid more attention in geography class, then I would have known to purchase tire chains so I could get over the mountains on my way to CA! I was surprised when I started getting to the higher elevations and everybody was pulling off the road. I thought maybe they had closed it for some reason. That's when I noticed that there was a horde of people getting out tire chains and putting them on. Obviously becoming from FL I didn't even have any with me, so I had to purchase some off a guy correct there on the side of the road.
Posted by: Truck Tire Chains | July 22, 2010 at 03:11 PM
Yes... it seems that the media is very biased to their own way of thinking and hasn't improved since you wrote this article.
Posted by: CNA Practice Test | July 28, 2010 at 12:29 AM
This law changes may be serious problem to truck drivers.
Posted by: cheap meridia | September 05, 2010 at 01:35 AM
I think that the new changes in the law are not so bad for the truck drivers, maybe at the beginning it will more difficult but if looking at the wide aspects for long time this is good law.
Posted by: moving quotes | September 30, 2010 at 07:03 AM
I got blind sided by my company, example I am hourly warehouse and relief driver and have a class A cdl. I can work in the warehouse 10 hrs a day all week then they have a short run (over 100 miles)on fri. and put in 8 hrs. on the road come back work the warehouse for two more hrs and because i made that run get knocked out of my overtime for the week, where as if I had stayed in the warehouse all week I would have gotten the overtime- how the hell can they manipulate labor laws this way ?
Posted by: Greg | December 05, 2010 at 11:50 AM
Like in any other places, there are some time limits whne trucks are travelling especially the loaded ones.
Posted by: paradise valley limo service | February 08, 2011 at 02:45 AM
Considerably, the post is in reality the freshest on that worthy topic. I agree with your conclusions and also definitely will eagerly look forward to your forthcoming updates.Saying thanks will certainly not just be sufficient, for the fantastic clarity in your writing.
Posted by: RI Law | April 06, 2011 at 06:19 AM
I work for Western Express in Alabama. I drive a yard truck that shuttles trailers to and from the International Paper plant across the street to be loaded and then back to our yard to be picked up by various carriers. I worked 12 hr days - 4days on, 4 days off. I punch a time clock when I arrive and when I leave and punch in and out for a 30 minute lunch. I believe I am entitled to overtime pay. Can someone clarify this for me? Thanks.
Posted by: Tim Gipe | November 30, 2011 at 06:45 AM